Back to All About SoWal

Beachfront Owners Sue Sheriff and County for Closing Beaches

Beach Fanatic
37,374 views
More dirty dealing by Huckabee and friends to bankrupt our county.

Property owners challenge Walton beach closure

Arguing that they are being prevented from using their “backyards,” oceanfront property owners are asking a federal judge to block a Walton County ordinance that has closed beaches amid the COVID-19 crisis.

WALTON LAWSUITDownload

The property owners filed the lawsuit and a request for an injunction Monday in federal court in Pensacola. It came after numerous local governments across the state closed beaches to prevent potential spread of the disease — and as Gov. Ron DeSantis has resisted ordering statewide beach closures.

The lawsuit alleges a Walton County ordinance passed last week is unconstitutional on a series of grounds, including that it is an unconstitutional “taking” of property without compensation and violates privacy and due-process rights. The case focuses on how the ordinance affects the rights of oceanfront property owners, rather than issues related to the general public.

“The county’s ordinance forces family members into a confined space within their house rather than allow them to social distance and recreate in their sandy backyard,” a memorandum filed with the lawsuit said. “Or it forces them to public locations to recreate potentially closer to many other persons increasing the risk of spreading COVID-19. Either way, it is counterproductive. And it is beyond reasonable dispute that any hypothetical, negligible benefit conjured by those who passed the Walton County ordinance cannot possibly outweigh the profound trammeling of the present plaintiffs’ constitutional rights.”

Under Florida law, privately owned beach property generally extends to a point known as the mean high-water line. The lawsuit also, however, points to property owners’ “littoral” rights, which provide access to the water.

The lawsuit alleges that the ordinance improperly applies to the private property, including allowing the Walton County Sheriff’s Office to enforce the restrictions against homeowners. Plaintiffs include former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

Beach closures have been a closely watched issue as Florida has grappled with the novel coronavirus, which causes the highly contagious and deadly COVID-19 respiratory disease. Images of crowds of beachgoers, including spring breakers, flashed across the country last month as the numbers of COVID-19 cases began to escalate, leading to calls for beach closures.

The Walton County property owners’ lawsuit was filed as a Leon County circuit judge considers a case filed by a Walton County attorney, Daniel Uhlfelder, that seeks to force DeSantis to close beaches statewide. Judge Kevin Carroll is slated to hold a hearing in that case Tuesday afternoon.

Walton County, between Panama City and Destin, has seen a building boom in recent years, with multimillion-dollar homes popping up along its beaches. It also has been a battleground about a controversial 2018 state law that dealt with public access to beaches.

The newly filed lawsuit cites an executive order that DeSantis issued last week directing Floridians to stay at home. The executive order includes a series of exceptions, including for recreational activities such as walking, biking, fishing, running and swimming.

The lawsuit alleges that the Walton County ordinance violates the executive order because it prevents the oceanfront homeowners from fishing and swimming from their properties. It also describes the ordinance, which revamped an earlier version, as “arbitrary and capricious.”

“The amended ordinance purports to be designed to ‘prevent the spread of COVID-19’ yet it has the opposite effect,” the lawsuit contends. “The amended ordinance prevents the plaintiffs, many of whom own residences along the beach, from utilizing their own backyards to quarantine or stay safe at home. The chances of a family or landowner catching or spreading COVID-19 is far less in his or her own private backyard (where no one else should be less they be trespassing) than traveling to the grocery store or hardware store or other essential business.”

Replies

139
Brittny
#127
Second statement regarding "wealth" is more of the same simple minded, class warfare crap that has absolutely no bearing on the subject.
Let them fockers eat cake!
Beach Fanatic
#128
Of course not. And you never will because you're in ABSOLUTE denial.


Obviously you didn't read the judicial decision from THREE judges. You see only what you want to see and then try to convince others that your vision is the only one with zero credible support.
Are you a lawyer or just posing as one. I’m certainly not. All you and I have are opinions. We are not experts in legal opinions but even if we were we still would not know how the appeals court will rule of course. My point is that you will never be satisfied with sharing the beach with or without compensation. Therefore the court would be wise to overturn and save themselves from continuous lawsuits. Obviously it would be foolish of me to try and convince you of anything. You are a victim and ain’t nobody going to change that except you. I am no longer in denial of how people can use victimization to justify anything…
BlueMtnBeachVagrant avatar
Beach Fanatic
#129
My point is that you will never be satisfied with sharing the beach with or without compensation.
Absolutely wrong, again.

Way back on SoWal, I suggested that beachfront owners share the back half of their beach which is typically lightly used in exchange for reduced or elimination of property tax. I sincerely felt both sides could have benefited from this.

And @Dave Rauschkolb wouldn't have any of it. Remember "All or None"? Customary Use and Our 30A Legacy
Beach Fanatic
#130
Absolutely wrong, again.

Way back on SoWal, I suggested that beachfront owners share the back half of their beach which is typically lightly used in exchange for reduced or elimination of property tax. I sincerely felt both sides could have benefited from this.

And @Dave Rauschkolb wouldn't have any of it. Remember "All or None"? Customary Use and Our 30A Legacy
Please put me in that same category as Dave. After communicating with you and Huckabee in this forum and learning from those who believe in their higher status in life I now realize you and he would never be satisfied with people that are what you may not say but believe are "lower class" or "underachieving" or "want something for nothing". I also tried to find common ground early on with the exchange with Huckabee but he would have nothing of it and you have followed in his hallowed foot steps. You know I am right. No elimination of any of your property tax for the purpose of sharing the "beach"!!!
UpNorth avatar
Beach Lover
#131
The most puzzling thing amongst all of this is the miles upon miles of public beach on both sides of 30A, that apparently isnt good enough. If I had a beach backyard, I'd love to use it. If I didnt, I'd want to be somewhere I wasnt being bothered by others. Seems on both ends theirs some serious entitlement issues.
Beach Fanatic
#132
The most puzzling thing amongst all of this is the miles upon miles of public beach on both sides of 30A, that apparently isnt good enough. If I had a beach backyard, I'd love to use it. If I didnt, I'd want to be somewhere I wasnt being bothered by others. Seems on both ends theirs some serious entitlement issues.
Champagne problems for sure.

It's ugly that many homeowners want to keep people out, not just the beach. Gates going up everywhere.
Beach Fanatic
#133
The most puzzling thing amongst all of this is the miles upon miles of public beach on both sides of 30A, that apparently isnt good enough. If I had a beach backyard, I'd love to use it. If I didnt, I'd want to be somewhere I wasnt being bothered by others. Seems on both ends theirs some serious entitlement issues.
Of course you would want to use. That in itself is not entitlement. However the beach is a "public" space "requiring" all of us to share this limited resource. If people bother you and sharing is not your thing (nothing wrong with that at all) then why not live on a space that allows your privacy? Wealth has allowed a few to believe they have both an entitlement to own public space and a right to exclude others from that public space. I am all for allowing beachfront owners a credit for sharing the public space however that is not what most of them want. Huckabee for example wanted to exclude people based on his believe that he has "status" or "power" that puts him "above" beach going people (peasants). His faith gave him that belief that a higher power allows for this. This is the can of worms that will eventually lead to another lost resource for the public...give an inch and they will take the whole beach...
jodiFL avatar
Beach Fanatic
#134
The most puzzling thing amongst all of this is the miles upon miles of public beach on both sides of 30A, that apparently isnt good enough. If I had a beach backyard, I'd love to use it. If I didnt, I'd want to be somewhere I wasnt being bothered by others. Seems on both ends theirs some serious entitlement issues.
only one "side" of 30A has beachfront......the south side. Anything north of 30A might have deeded access, but that access might only be 20 feet wide.
UpNorth avatar
Beach Lover
#135
only one "side" of 30A has beachfront......the south side. Anything north of 30A might have deeded access, but that access might only be 20 feet wide.
Sides as in east and west. If someone came at me with a powertool for whatever reason, next time I’d probably go elsewhere. Mere minutes from this hotly contested 30a sand, is virtually identical sand, many many miles of it, with none of this conflict, in West PCB. Everyone wants to have their cake and eat it too. But it’s a really easily solvable problem that doesn’t require frivolous lawsuits, complaining to municipalities, or threats of violence.
Jess Armstrong
#136
Walton County should tax beachfront owners $100k per inch.
Or the option for Beach rights given back to the public as God intended!
Beach Fanatic
#137
Sides as in east and west. If someone came at me with a powertool for whatever reason, next time I’d probably go elsewhere. Mere minutes from this hotly contested 30a sand, is virtually identical sand, many many miles of it, with none of this conflict, in West PCB. Everyone wants to have their cake and eat it too. But it’s a really easily solvable problem that doesn’t require frivolous lawsuits, complaining to municipalities, or threats of violence.
If someone threatens anyone with a power tool and then sues that person for not being intimidated for standing their ground or defending their rights to the beach I would call that person abusive and overly privileged. Turning the other cheek as you suggest is noble. Standing your ground and protecting your rights is also noble and brave. The best way to solve this is to share the cake or go make a cake that you do not have to share in a different kitchen...
Beach Fanatic
#139
I already did in 2019.

"Without a doubt you’re mind melding with Dave Rauschkolb."
Wow has it been 6 years since Huckabee wielded his authority over our 20 something miles of paradise and then left us to sort it all out? It is the end of another year and positions have hardened and intensified like concrete homes and power drills. Wishing there was some compromise where everyone is happy seems to be non-existent. 99% of us should be on the same page because this is about how wealth and power want control of all things including the way we use and share our valuable resources and not be manipulated with words like left and right or liberal and conservative or socialism and capitalism and religion and secularism and finally good and evil. For this new year coming up my hope is for people to stop being manipulated and learn how to socialize again. I hear religious people telling me there is only one truth and if you are not part of that truth you are wrong. I believe Truth is a purpose that needs to be questioned and explored but most of all needs to be inclusive...
UofL avatar
Beach Fanatic
#140
Was this part of the Walton County only beach rule? Or all of Florida beaches at the beginning of covid? Ellen (long time visitor, not so frequent anymore)

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.